The arrest of an Indian couple in the US who allegedly ran a prostitution ring by luring female actresses from India has shone a spotlight on casting couch allegations surrounding the southern Telugu-language film industry. Also known as Tollywood, it is one of India's biggest regional film industries and routinely produces blockbuster hits that rival Bollywood's most popular films. According to recently revealed federal charges, Kishan Modugumudi and his wife, Chandra, arranged for at least peddapuram prostitution Telugu actresses to travel to the US on the pretext of attending cultural events as performers or guests.
How old am I: 34
India may be seeing achhe din or not , but for certain sections of the community, there are none. Prostitution is not technically illegal in India, and even in places that it is, it exists. Prostitution is one of the oldest professions in the world, and as long as people are ready to pay for sex, it will exist.
Know more. The Writ Petition is filed for a writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the rowdy-sheet proceedings peddapuram prostitution and continued by the respondents-authorities peddapuram prostitution illegal and unconstitutional and for a consequential direction to remove the petitioner's name from the Rowdy Sheet Register and to pass appropriate orders. The case of the petitioner is that he is a law abiding citizen and a businessman running business in fancy article's and jewellery under the name and style of Sri Fancy and Ladies Corner at Peddapuram, commanding good reputation in the society.
It was also stated that one M. It is also stated that the petitioner is only an eye-witness and hence being instigated by unsocial elements the 3rd respondent - Station House Officer, Peddapuram foisted a criminal case in Cr. It is also stated that since the petitioner is an eye-witness in Cr. It is also specifically stated that invading peddapuram prostitution personal liberty of the petitioner under the guise of surveillance by detaining him in the Police Station and disturbing his day-to-day business and calling him peddapuram prostitution Police Station at odd hours peddapuram prostitution night is ultra vires the Constitution of Peddapuram prostitution, especially Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
It was further stated that none of the conditions contemplated by Standing Order of A. Police Standing Orders are fulfilled in the present case and the inclusion of the name of the petitioner as a rowdy sheeter in the rowdy-sheet is in violation of the Standing Order of the A. Police Standing Orders.
The 3rd respondent filed a peddapuram prostitution in detail. It is stated that the Petitioner is indulging in illegal activities and in fact Sri Fancy and Ladies Corner at Peddapuram, East Godavari District is a big trap place to create prostitution in Peddapuram village. It is also stated that Sri M. Chandrasekhar is a close associate and illegal business partner of the petitioner and he filed a false case before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram and the same was forwarded to Inspector of Police, Peddapuram for investigation and the same was referred as false and also observed that it is a counterblast to demoralize the investigation in Cr.
It is further stated that the 2nd respondent is no way concerned with the criminal case peddapuram prostitution by one Sri M. Chandrasekhar in which the petitioner allegedly incorporated himself as a witness. It is further stated that the 2nd respondent is a District Officer having peddapuram prostitution office and establishment at Kakinada, but without knowing anything and without acquainted with the facts, the address was shown as the D. Peddapuram which is false and baseless. It is further stated that the rowdy-sheet was opened after obtaining full and correct antecedents on as per the orders of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer.
Peddapuram dated All the other allegations also had been specifically denied.
Peddapuram prostitution is also stated that the G. It is further stated that Standing Order also is attracted and the name of the writ petitioner was included after observing all the legal formalities in accordance with the provisions of law and in accordance with the A.
Police Standing Orders without any ulterior motive and it is also specifically stated that the writ petitioner who is peddapuram prostitution supplier of ladies by engaging them to achieve unlawful gain, has been indulging in illegal activities and hence to keep surveillance over the activities of the petitioner, the rowdy-sheet has to be maintained. It is also stated that this measure is taken to prevent prostitution and also to save the humanity from the clutches of incurable and dangerous diseases like AIDS so as to save Peddapuram village, the State of Andhra Pradesh and in the interests of public at peddapuram prostitution.
A reply also was filed peddapuram prostitution the allegations made in the counter-affidavit and also reiterating the stand taken by the writ petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition. Now the short question which falls for consideration in the present Writ Petition is whether inclusion of the name of the writ peddapuram prostitution in the rowdy-sheet is sustainable in law. Sri P. Vidyasagar, the learned Counsel for the writ petitioner had taken me through both Standing Orders and of the A.
Police Standing Orders and had contended that none of the conditions specified therein had been satisfied and hence the inclusion of the name of the writ petitioner in the rowdy-sheet is not only illegal, but also unconstitutional, being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
The learned Counsel also had pointed out that under the guise of surveillance the Police are peddapuram prostitution with the day-to-day activities, including the business and making the life of the writ petitioner miserable. Peddapuram prostitution was further contended that rowdy-sheet cannot be opened against any individual in a casual or a mechanical manner unless the conditions specified in Standing Order of A.
Police Standing Orders, dealing with Rowdies, are satisfied.
Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada and Anr. Sri Srimannarayana, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home had vehemently contended that there are no mala fides on the part of the respondents in opening the rowdy-sheet as against the writ petitioner and it is only in public interest. The learned Counsel also had pointed out when the illegal activities of the writ petitioner are being checked by the Police, peddapuram prostitution writ petitioner had resorted to the acts which had been clearly specified in the counter-affidavit.
The learned Counsel also had drawn my attention to both Standing Orders and of the A. Police Standing Orders and had contended that the public interest will suffer if a direction as prayed for by the writ petitioner is issued by the Court and at the best in case the Court feels that sufficient material is not available, the concerned authorities may be given liberty to renew sic. Heard both the Counsel and perused the respective pleadings of the parties and the material available on record.
It is fairly accepted even by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the present case does not fall under Standing Order of the A. Standing Order of the A. Police Standing Orders, dealing with Rowdies, re as follows:. A careful peddapuram prostitution of the provision clearly goes to show that none of the conditions specified in the said Order are peddapuram prostitution in the present case. No doubt strong reliance is placed on Standing Order 1 dwhich specifies "persons who habitually tease women and girls by passing indecent remarks or otherwise".
However, there is no material placed in this regard. In peddapuram prostitution decision referred 1 peddapuram prostitution was held that under Standing Order of the A. Police Standing Orders, the opening of a rowdy sheet in the case of habitual offenders can be relating to persons who habitually commit or abet commission of offences involving breach of peace and they must have a tendency to disturb public peace and tranquility and the same cannot be opened in a mechanical manner.
As can be seen peddapuram prostitution the record, except registering one crime i. But here, the Court is concerned with the justifiability or otherwise of the opening of the rowdy sheet as against the petitioner. Peddapuram prostitution the present case, not only that the conditions specified in Standing Order of A. Police Standing Orders are not at all satisfied, but apart from it, there is no material also to support the decision taken by the police to open peddapuram prostitution rowdy-sheet as against the writ petitioner.
It is needless to say that it is not only contrary to the A. Police Standing Order but it is also violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and arbitrary action which is not sustainable in law.
For the foregoing peddapuram prostitution, the Writ Petition is allowed, however in the facts and circumstances of the case, no order as to costs. By clicking on this tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the attorneys appearing in this matter. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly peddapuram prostitution and verified the judgment.
In case of any confusion, feel free to reach out peddapuram prostitution us. Peddapuram prostitution your message here. How is this helpful for me? Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact peddapuram prostitution with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization. Creating a unique profile web peddapuram prostitution interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines peddapuram prostitution Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your peddapuram prostitution peddapuram prostitution similar matters. Create your profile now Close. ON OFF. Section 3, Clause 12 of the Towns Nuisances Act; d persons. pleading to use the new AI search. Gudivada Sai Baba v.
State Of A. Case Information. Section 75 of the Madras Peddapuram prostitution Police Act. Police Standing Orders, dealing peddapuram prostitution Rowdies, re as follows: 1 The following persons may be classified as rowdies peddapuram prostitution Rowdy sheets Form 88 may be opened for them under the order of the Superintendent of Police or Sub-Divisional Officer: a persons who habitually commit, attempt to commit or abet the commission of, offences involving a breach of the peace; b persons bound over Under Sections, c peddapuram prostitution 1 of the Peddapuram prostitution of Criminal Peddapuram prostitution, Act No.
This is a paid feature. Please subscribe to download the judgment. Edit Citation. Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above change. Save Cancel. Add Equivalent Citation. Add Cancel.
Key Phrases are not available yet. Load More.
Select Preference. Share the Judgment. Citation Codes. Share Close. Are you sure? Name of party represented -- Select Claim this judgment Submit Cancel. Remove Judgment Cancel.
Browse our free sex personals...
Book Direct and Save!...
However, there are...
Now! Adult Matchmaking, live...
Ihavesynth Tifton. Aulona, 26 years...
British Escort Takes...
Relatives mourning the death...
You can find...
Say hello to...
Phoenix locanto Bbbj near...
Indiana is an ethnic melting...
We're excited to show you...